Corpus specification, edition 1.
Everything a technical team needs to decide: schema, closed vocabularies, taxonomy, composition, coverage, quality control, disclosures, delivery formats and licence. Print this page to keep a PDF.
Trap-based evaluation and preference data.
A 3,009-item corpus for English–Arabic legal and financial translation, across 74 thematic chunks. Each item isolates one diagnosable failure mode, pairing the attorney-grade correct rendering against the plausible-but-wrong output an MT system or non-lawyer actually produces, with a written rationale explaining what the wrong version does to the legal meaning.
Two field sets, keyed by task.
One JSON object per line. Key order is constant. IDs run alfe-0001–alfe-3009, continuous, no gaps.
EN→AR — en_to_ar_term, clause_faithfulness, register_adaptation
{
"id": "alfe-0010",
"domain": "islamic_finance",
"register": "MSA",
"task": "en_to_ar_term",
"source_en": "constructive possession",
"gold_ar": "القبض الحُكمي",
"chosen_ar": "القبض الحُكمي",
"rejected_ar": "الحيازة البنائية",
"error_type": "domain_term_of_art",
"rationale": "the established fiqh term ...",
"difficulty": "hard"
}
AR→EN — ar_to_en_term
The same set with source_ar, gold_en, chosen_en and rejected_en in place of the four EN→AR answer fields.
Closed vocabularies
domain | contract_law · corporate · litigation · islamic_finance · M&A |
register | MSA · Egyptian Arabic · Levantine Arabic · Gulf Arabic |
task | en_to_ar_term · clause_faithfulness · ar_to_en_term · register_adaptation |
difficulty | easy · medium · hard, skewed hard |
error_type | Fifteen values, listed in section 3 |
gold and chosen are not interchangeable. gold is the full reference, often carrying a bracketed gloss or an accepted variant; chosen is the tight form a practitioner writes. Use gold for scored evaluation and chosen for preference pairs.Fifteen named failure modes.
Every item carries exactly one. Group results by it and you get a failure profile, not a score.
| error_type | What goes wrong |
|---|---|
polysemy_false_sense | Right word, wrong semantic branch |
legal_meaning_drift | Plausible Arabic that loses or inverts the legal effect |
near_synonym_drift | Adjacent term that shifts doctrine or register |
concept_calque | Structural transfer that strips the legal concept |
false_cognate | Diacritical or near-form confusion |
domain_term_of_art | Wrong choice between two doctrinal bodies |
literal_calque | Word-by-word where a term of art exists |
under_translation | Right root, too weak — strips an element |
register_and_compliance | Register failure and compliance failure stacked |
compliance_critical | Sharia-compliance violation (riba framing and kin) |
term_of_art | Non-standard, academic, or wrong-tradition term |
register_mismatch | Right concept, wrong register for the audience |
unnecessary_transliteration | Latin importation where the Arabic is settled |
modality_loss | Obligation downgraded to prediction |
void_vs_voidable | Conflates void ab initio with rescindable |
What the file covers.
| Dimension | Full corpus | Pilot set (505) |
|---|---|---|
| Items | 3,009 (alfe-0001–3009) | 505 (alfe-0001–0505) |
| Domain | Five domains; corporate and contract law the largest | contract_law 169 · corporate 118 · islamic_finance 89 · litigation 87 · M&A 42 |
| Register | MSA plus 220+ dialect items in matched triples | MSA 453 · Gulf 18 · Egyptian 17 · Levantine 17 |
| Task | Four types; 480+ operative clauses, 240+ AR→EN items | en_to_ar_term 295 · clause_faithfulness 81 · ar_to_en_term 77 · register_adaptation 52 |
| Difficulty | Skewed hard | medium 239 · hard 171 · easy 95 |
| Compliance-critical | 95+ items | 28 items (plus 7 register_and_compliance) |
Pilot figures are machine-verified against the delivered file itself.
What we check, and what we tell you before you buy.
Checks on every build
- Schema and key order per task type
- Taxonomy values within the published closed sets
- Script integrity: no Latin in Arabic fields, no Arabic in English fields, NFC normalised
- Contiguous IDs, no gaps
chosen≠rejected; no duplicate sources within or across builds- Second-pass read of every dialect and compound-clause item, plus a random sample, then author sign-off
Disclosed up front
- Nine source headwords appear twice, all within
alfe-0001–1001and listed with IDs. Six pairs test materially different failure modes; three are near-redundant. - Some items describe regimes that move — virtual-asset licensing, the BNPL perimeter, apostille membership, passenger-rights compensation.
- Dialect items are a deliberate minority: MSA carries the drafting vocabulary and is weighted accordingly.
- Chunk notes travel with each block of 42 items, listing domain, distribution and review priorities.
What you receive, and on what terms.
| Format | JSONL, one object per line, plus a pretty-printed JSON review copy. Other formats — preference pairs, SFT triples, Parquet — on request at scaled tiers. |
| Accompanying | Build notes, schema card and licence certificate. Per-chunk files and chunk notes at scaled tiers. |
| Delivery | Pilot on purchase. Larger licences by private expiring link, with a 14-day acceptance window from delivery. |
| Permitted use | Training, fine-tuning, evaluation, benchmarking and alignment. Models and outputs belong to the Licensee. |
| Not permitted | Redistributing, publishing or sublicensing the corpus, or using it to build a competing dataset. |
| Governing law | The laws of the State of Delaware; Delaware courts. |
Cite as: Fidem Praxis, “Arabic Legal & Financial Translation Corpus,” Edition 1, 3,009 items, https://fidempraxis.com/services/arabic-legal-corpus